Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	93 of 129	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	57 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Learning yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative16 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“usually considered more LMS-oriented, but often part of LXP evaluations depending on the use case” GPT-5.4 mini · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Learning, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Learning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cornerstone OnDemand45 of 483Not in the top three

Docebo40 of 4811Not in the top three

Workday Learning26 of 480Not in the top three

Absorb LMS25 of 482Not in the top three

Moodle20 of 480Not in the top three

TalentLMS17 of 484Not in the top three

360Learning17 of 480Not in the top three

SAP Litmos11 of 480Not in the top three

Intellum7 of 480Not in the top three

LearnUpon7 of 480Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 48 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Learning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docebo.com23

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

talentlms.com13

capterra.com12

d2l.com12

elearningindustry.com12

intellum.com12

g2.com10

forbes.com9

lmspedia.org9

125 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Learning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms12

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/best-learning-management-system10

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-learning-management-system9

talentlms.com/blog/best-enterprise-lms9

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/docebo-vs-cornerstone8

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-enterprise-learning-management-system8

paylocity.com/why-paylocity/compare/lists/enterprise-learning-management-system8

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-learning-management-systems-20267

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP SuccessFactors Learning

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP SuccessFactors Learning / Litmos 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.