Every category where a model named Intellum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	63 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intellum yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intellum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited search functionality: Poor content findability and personalization” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intellum, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intellum was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo17 of 185Not in the top three

Absorb LMS17 of 181Not in the top three

360Learning16 of 180Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand15 of 182Not in the top three

SAP Litmos10 of 180Not in the top three

Moodle9 of 180Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors Learning7 of 181Not in the top three

Skilljar7 of 180Not in the top three

TalentLMS6 of 180Not in the top three

Thought Industries6 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intellum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Intellum and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

intellum.comYour site16

d2l.com11

docebo.com9

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

goskills.com7

talentlms.com7

360learning.com6

continu.com5

g2.com5

gartner.com5

Sixty-four of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Intellum came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms16

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-learning-management-system7

d2l.com/blog/enterprise-learning-management-system6

talentlms.com/blog/best-enterprise-lms6

continu.com/software/best-learning-management-system5

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-learning-technologies5

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared5

intervue.io/blog/best-enterprise-lms-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Intellum

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intellum; a claim can dispute any of them.

Intellum Platform 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intellum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intellum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intellum.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.