HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Skilljar · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Skilljar

19Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skilljar was named 3 times in Learning experience plat and 2 other categories, where Learn Amp led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business54 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market49 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 61

under the label threshold

In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skilljar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	49 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	66 of 74	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	102 of 162	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skilljar yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skilljar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms like *Skilljar* are amazing if you are 100% focused on B2B customer education, but weak for internal HR compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skilljar, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skilljar was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo18 of 195Not in the top three

360Learning12 of 190Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand12 of 190Not in the top three

Absorb LMS10 of 191Not in the top three

Moodle8 of 190Not in the top three

Thought Industries8 of 190Not in the top three

TalentLMS7 of 192Not in the top three

Intellum7 of 190Not in the top three

LearnUpon6 of 191Not in the top three

SAP Litmos6 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skilljar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 19 answers that named Skilljar and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

intellum.com10

docebo.com9

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

d2l.com7

360learning.com6

goskills.com6

elearningindustry.com5

ispring.com5

talentlms.com5

g2.com4

Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Skilljar came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms9

d2l.com/blog/enterprise-learning-management-system6

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-learning-management-system4

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/learning-management-system3

clearcompany.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-learning-management-system3

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/enterprise-lms3

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms3

intervue.io/blog/best-enterprise-lms-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skilljar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skilljar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skilljar.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.