Every category where a model named NAVEX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	13 of 80	0%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NAVEX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NAVEX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels3

Paraphrase13 labels6

Comparative23 labels9not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Used heavily across the Fortune 500. Best for enterprise-scale governance, risk & compliance (GRC) with strong audit trails.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance training · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose NAVEX if you want: training plus policy/incident/risk management, enterprise-scale compliance workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Compliance training · comparative prompt · first choice

“best if you want a larger ethics/compliance platform that includes harassment prevention” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“consider bundling through a broader compliance platform like NAVEX/LRN” Kimi K2 · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NAVEX, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NAVEX was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Traliant39 of 607Not in the top three

EasyLlama29 of 603Not in the top three

Skillsoft29 of 600Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand26 of 603Not in the top three

Emtrain25 of 601Not in the top three

Ethena24 of 601Not in the top three

LRN22 of 600Not in the top three

Coggno19 of 604Not in the top three

Absorb LMS19 of 602Not in the top three

SAI36018 of 600Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NAVEX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 60 answers that named NAVEX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coggno.com40

bizlibrary.com26

compliquest.com26

emtrain.com26

traliant.com23

valamis.com20

expertinsights.com18

navex.comYour site18

hrtechsaas.com16

konstantly.com14

209 of the 227 domain citations in answers naming NAVEX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

emtrain.com/blog/ethics-and-compliance/the-best-compliance-training-vendors-in-2026-compar24

bizlibrary.com/blog/training-programs/top-10-compliance-training-content-providers21

valamis.com/blog/best-compliance-training-software19

expertinsights.com/compliance/top-compliance-training-solutions18

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms16

compliquest.com/en/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms-compared-202614

konstantly.com/blog/compliance-training-software-comparison14

shiftelt.com/hr-compliance-training-providers-comparison13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as NAVEX

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NAVEX; a claim can dispute any of them.

NAVEX One 2NAVEX (NAVEX One) 1NAVEX Global 1NAVEX/LRN 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NAVEX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NAVEX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at navex.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.