Every category where a model named Traliant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	22%	1 of 80	0%	29	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Traliant yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Traliant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2	4
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	4
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase30 labels17

Comparative34 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Traliant if you want: better learner engagement, workplace conduct/harassment-focused content, a training-first solution.” GPT-5.4 mini · Compliance training · comparative prompt · first choice

“I'd most often recommend Traliant ... Traliant is the safest default for a mid-sized B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Start with a demo request for Traliant (for engagement) and NetExpedition (for legal rigor)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Compliance-first library with strong course quality and a focus on engaging, customizable content.” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Traliant, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Traliant was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EasyLlama53 of 7717Not in the top three

NAVEX39 of 7710Not in the top three

Ethena39 of 776Not in the top three

Emtrain30 of 771Not in the top three

Coggno24 of 771Not in the top three

Skillsoft21 of 770Not in the top three

LRN20 of 770Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand19 of 770Not in the top three

Absorb LMS16 of 772Not in the top three

Kantola16 of 771Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Traliant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 77 answers that named Traliant and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coggno.com51

compliquest.com42

bizlibrary.com36

emtrain.com34

traliant.comYour site34

mitratech.com25

g2.com22

expertinsights.com19

hr.university18

shiftelt.com18

265 of the 299 domain citations in answers naming Traliant came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bizlibrary.com/blog/training-programs/top-10-compliance-training-content-providers30

emtrain.com/blog/ethics-and-compliance/the-best-compliance-training-vendors-in-2026-compar30

mitratech.com/resource-hub/blog/top-5-hr-compliance-training-vendors-for-small-to-medium-s25

compliquest.com/en/blog/best-harassment-prevention-training-platforms-202624

coggno.com/blog/best-workplace-harassment-prevention-training-202621

expertinsights.com/compliance/top-compliance-training-solutions19

shiftelt.com/hr-compliance-training-providers-comparison18

valamis.com/blog/best-compliance-training-software18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Traliant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Traliant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at traliant.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.