Every category where a model named LRN for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	16 of 80	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LRN yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LRN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Known for ethics, values-based programs, and governance/risk management for global enterprises.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative

“consider bundling through a broader compliance platform like NAVEX/LRN” Kimi K2 · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“For Legal Defensibility: Prioritize *NAVEX*, *LRN*, or *CompliQuest*.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LRN, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LRN was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NAVEX22 of 247Not in the top three

Traliant20 of 245Not in the top three

Skillsoft19 of 240Not in the top three

EasyLlama16 of 241Not in the top three

Emtrain16 of 241Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand12 of 240Not in the top three

Ethena12 of 240Not in the top three

Absorb LMS9 of 240Not in the top three

SAI3608 of 241Not in the top three

Coggno7 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LRN. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 24 answers that named LRN and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coggno.com18

emtrain.com17

bizlibrary.com13

traliant.com13

compliquest.com9

expertinsights.com9

shiftelt.com9

easyllama.com6

smartdatacollective.com6

theprimevr.com6

106 of the 106 domain citations in answers naming LRN came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

emtrain.com/blog/ethics-and-compliance/the-best-compliance-training-vendors-in-2026-compar17

bizlibrary.com/blog/training-programs/top-10-compliance-training-content-providers13

expertinsights.com/compliance/top-compliance-training-solutions9

shiftelt.com/hr-compliance-training-providers-comparison9

traliant.com/blog/top-10-compliance-training-providers9

coggno.com/blog/best-enterprise-compliance-training-companies-for-highly-regulated-industr6

coggno.com/blog/best-enterprise-compliance-training-providers-for-strict-regulatory-enviro6

compliquest.com/en/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms-compared-20266

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LRN

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LRN; a claim can dispute any of them.

NAVEX/LRN 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LRN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LRN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lrn.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.