PushFar vs ADPList
Zero of twelve models named PushFar first on the direct prompt; zero named ADPList. PushFar was named by eleven of the twelve models and ADPList by twelve and PushFar carries 21 labels and ADPList 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mentoring software page.
By framing
PushFarFirst choices, of twelve modelsADPList
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, PushFar and ADPList were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 66 answers naming PushFar and the 32 naming ADPList. In those answers ADPList took the first choice zero times and PushFar four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
PushFar ADPList first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PushFar on the left and ADPList on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was named
12 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PushFar39%#1 of 11ADPList0%#– of 11PushFar0%#– of 7ADPList0%#– of 7What the models said about PushFar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“PushFar is more affordable but less feature-rich” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“If you need to scale beyond ~10 people: PushFar (~$200/month flat) is the cheapest way to run a proper company-wide program” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“PushFar stands out as the top recommendation for mentoring program software” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“start with Mentornity (if under 10 users) or PushFar (~$200/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about ADPList
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“ADPList: A free platform with a large pool of mentors, but limited slots and no accountability built-in.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“Platforms with Ethical Controversies or "Ghosting" Issues (Exercise Caution) Example: ADPList” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“ADPList — ⚠️ Moderate Caution” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“start with a free plan from a reputable platform like ADPList, MicroMentor, or SCORE” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Free or community-based platforms (like ADPList, MicroMentor, SCORE, and UStrive) are often safer choices for individuals” Mistral Small · negative prompt · alternative
“Prefer platforms with verified mentors, refunds, and positive volume reviews (e.g., ADPList for free tech mentoring” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.