Mentorgain vs PushFar
Three of twelve models named Mentorgain first on the direct prompt; zero named PushFar. Mentorgain was named by eight of the twelve models and PushFar by eleven and Mentorgain carries 22 labels and PushFar 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mentoring software page.
By framing
MentorgainFirst choices, of twelve modelsPushFar
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Mentorgain and PushFar were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 49 answers naming Mentorgain and the 66 naming PushFar. In those answers PushFar took the first choice ten times and Mentorgain two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Mentorgain PushFar first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mentorgain on the left and PushFar on the right.The direct prompt
Mentorgain first, PushFar not the choice
3 of 12 modelsPushFar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PushFar39%#1 of 11Mentorgain2%#7 of 11Mentorgain12%#3 of 11PushFar10%#4 of 11What the models said about Mentorgain
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd start with Together Platform or Mentorgain for a demo. They hit the sweet spot of functionality without enterprise complexity.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best employee mentoring platform for a mid-sized B2B company would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best overall value for a mid‑market B2B company (fast go‑live, low cost, strong features): Mentorgain” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about PushFar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“PushFar is more affordable but less feature-rich” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“If you need to scale beyond ~10 people: PushFar (~$200/month flat) is the cheapest way to run a proper company-wide program” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“PushFar stands out as the top recommendation for mentoring program software” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“start with Mentornity (if under 10 users) or PushFar (~$200/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.