Every category where a model named Mentorgain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	12%	3 of 55	0%	22	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mentorgain yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mentorgain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	2	1	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	1	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels4

Paraphrase9 labels2

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd start with Together Platform or Mentorgain for a demo. They hit the sweet spot of functionality without enterprise complexity.” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the best employee mentoring platform for a mid-sized B2B company would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best overall value for a mid‑market B2B company (fast go‑live, low cost, strong features): Mentorgain” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice

“Mid-market / fast deployment: Together, Mentorloop, Ten Thousand Coffees, Mentorgain” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mentorgain, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mentorgain was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Together34 of 497Compare →

MentorcliQ30 of 491Not in the top three

PushFar29 of 4910Not in the top three

Mentorloop29 of 495Compare →

Chronus27 of 490Not in the top three

Qooper24 of 497Not in the top three

Mentornity21 of 498Not in the top three

Ten Thousand Coffees11 of 490Not in the top three

MicroMentor8 of 490Not in the top three

Guider7 of 490Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mentorgain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 49 answers that named Mentorgain and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brancher.com.au40

mentorgain.comYour site38

gartner.com33

qooper.io30

chronus.com26

guideflow.com24

getapp.com21

g2.com19

peoplemanagingpeople.com19

softwareadvice.com19

231 of the 269 domain citations in answers naming Mentorgain came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software40

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software33

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms25

mentorgain.com/blog/best-mentorship-software-for-companies21

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software19

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software18

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software15

softwareadvice.com/mentoring15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mentorgain

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mentorgain; a claim can dispute any of them.

MentorGain 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mentorgain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mentorgain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mentorgain.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.