Every category where a model named Together for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	37%	1 of 55	5%	43	endorsed leader
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	29 of 116	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Together yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Together across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	2	0	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	2	0	5
Mistral Small	2	0	2	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	1	0	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	2	1	1	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Kimi K2	2	2	1	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	1	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct33 labels14

Paraphrase29 labels11

Comparative33 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels6

Scale-constrained16 labels2

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative145 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If I had to pick one safe bet for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd start with Together Platform or Mentorgain for a demo.” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Together is the best all-around choice due to its mid-market-specific design, transparent flat-rate pricing, strong AI matching” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice

“Together stands out as the most balanced choice due to its AI-driven matching, strong integrations, and proven track record” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Together and Mentorgain are top choices due to their clear pricing, scalability, and focus on the mid-market segment” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While industry giants like Together, Chronus, and MentorcliQ are excellent, their pricing often starts at $5,000 to $12,000+ per year, which is out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative

“more premium/custom-priced and usually overkill for tight budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Together, over the 145 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Together was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MentorcliQ104 of 14515Not in the top three

Chronus99 of 14511Not in the top three

Qooper96 of 14520Not in the top three

Mentorloop78 of 14516Compare →

PushFar46 of 14515Not in the top three

Ten Thousand Coffees40 of 1450Not in the top three

Mentorgain34 of 1451Compare →

Guider26 of 1450Not in the top three

Mentornity22 of 1456Not in the top three

ADPList19 of 1450Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Together. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 120 of the 145 answers that named Together and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qooper.io91

chronus.com78

gartner.com77

brancher.com.au75

togetherplatform.comYour site63

mentorgain.com62

mentorcliq.com53

guideflow.com52

g2.com51

mentorcity.com45

584 of the 647 domain citations in answers naming Together came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software77

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms71

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software70

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software44

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software43

mentorcity.com/best-enterprise-mentoring-software40

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software40

qooper.io/blog/best-enterprise-mentoring-software40

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Together

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Together; a claim can dispute any of them.

Together Platform 10Together Software 3Together Mentorship 2Together Mentoring 1Together Platform (by Absorb LMS) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Together's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Together, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at togetherplatform.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.