HR AI Index
Index Vendors › MentorcliQ · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

MentorcliQ

128Judge labels
15First choices
34Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
27% in Mentoring software for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 55 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 33 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MentorcliQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Mentoring softwareLearning and development2%7 of 5512%33accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MentorcliQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MentorcliQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini12003
Gemini 3.5 Flash01023
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast02204
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash13015
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00202
Kimi K201113
GLM 4.7 FlashX03104
MiniMax M2.510102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels7
Paraphrase27 labels7
Comparative29 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels1
Scale-constrained16 labelsNone
Negative12 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative128 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd usually recommend MentorcliQ if you want a more established, enterprise-grade platform that still fits mid-market teams.” GPT-5.4 mini · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Often rated "best overall" for deep enterprise mentoring, AI-assisted admin, and ERG (employee resource group) support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · first choice
“Corporate mentoring programs: Chronus, MentorcliQ, Together” MiniMax M2.5 · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best For: Companies looking to scale existing programs with advanced analytics and personality-based matching.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Heavyweight systems built for the Fortune 500 (like Chronus or MentorcliQ) are often overkill and budget-prohibitive for this segment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“their pricing often starts at $5,000 to $12,000+ per year, which is out of reach for companies with tight budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
“more premium/custom-priced and usually overkill for tight budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
“MentorcliQ — ⚠️ Low Caution (Enterprise)” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MentorcliQ, over the 128 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MentorcliQ was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Together104 of 12820Not in the top three
Chronus102 of 1288Not in the top three
Qooper90 of 12823Not in the top three
Mentorloop60 of 12810Not in the top three
Ten Thousand Coffees41 of 1281Not in the top three
PushFar38 of 12813Not in the top three
Mentorgain30 of 1284Not in the top three
Guider23 of 1280Not in the top three
ADPList21 of 1280Not in the top three
Mentornity19 of 1287Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MentorcliQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 111 of the 128 answers that named MentorcliQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qooper.io84
chronus.com71
brancher.com.au67
gartner.com66
mentorcliq.comYour site58
togetherplatform.com52
mentorgain.com50
g2.com44
guideflow.com43
mentorcity.com41

518 of the 576 domain citations in answers naming MentorcliQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MentorcliQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MentorcliQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mentorcliq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack