Every category where a model named Guider for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	0%	14 of 55	0%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Guider yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Guider across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: enterprises that want a guided mentoring experience with onboarding and reporting.” GPT-5.4 mini · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · alternative

“Guider is another option that offers a straightforward and affordable mentoring platform” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · direct prompt · alternative

“Mentorloop and Guider offer good value with flexible pricing tiers” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · direct prompt · alternative

“Great for skill-based matching and offers a very polished user interface.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Guider, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Guider was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Together26 of 285Not in the top three

Chronus24 of 284Not in the top three

MentorcliQ23 of 286Not in the top three

Qooper23 of 285Not in the top three

Mentorloop20 of 281Not in the top three

Ten Thousand Coffees17 of 280Not in the top three

PushFar14 of 282Not in the top three

ADPList10 of 280Not in the top three

MentorCity8 of 280Not in the top three

Mentorgain7 of 281Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Guider. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 28 answers that named Guider and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qooper.io22

chronus.com21

gartner.com15

brancher.com.au14

mentorgain.com13

togetherplatform.com12

mentorcliq.com11

hrlineup.com9

g2.com8

growthmentor.com7

132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Guider came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms20

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software15

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software14

qooper.io/blog/top-10-online-mentoring-platforms11

hrlineup.com/top-mentorship-software9

mentorgain.com/blog/best-mentorship-software-for-companies9

qooper.io/blog/best-enterprise-mentoring-software8

qooper.io/blog/mentoring-platforms-for-large-companies-and-global-organizations8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Guider's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Guider, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at guide.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.