Every category where a model named Mentorloop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	12%	2 of 55	8%	36	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mentorloop yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mentorloop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	0	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	3	0	0	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	1	3
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	2	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct23 labels5

Paraphrase14 labels5

Comparative27 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labels3

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative98 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mentorloop is the well-known mid-market option ... a sensible pick when you want a real program but are not a Fortune 500.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice

“Together Software or Mentorloop are likely your best bets due to their ease of use and mid-market focus.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Mentorloop is the most practical starting point due to its low administrative barrier and high ROI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Mid-market / fast deployment: Together, Mentorloop, Ten Thousand Coffees, Mentorgain” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“lower entry price, but note that Smart Match and HRIS are locked behind the Enterprise tier” Perplexity Sonar · Mentoring software · direct prompt · soft negative

“Mentorloop offers a lower entry price but locks some features behind its Enterprise plan” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · direct prompt · soft negative

“mid-sized fit over niche/SMB tools (e.g., Mentorloop)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mentorloop, over the 98 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mentorloop was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Together78 of 9818Compare →

Qooper64 of 989Not in the top three

MentorcliQ60 of 989Not in the top three

Chronus55 of 986Not in the top three

PushFar47 of 9813Not in the top three

Mentorgain29 of 983Compare →

Mentornity27 of 989Not in the top three

Ten Thousand Coffees25 of 980Not in the top three

Guider20 of 980Not in the top three

ADPList16 of 981Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mentorloop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 87 of the 98 answers that named Mentorloop and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qooper.io59

brancher.com.au55

chronus.com53

gartner.com49

mentorgain.com47

g2.com42

guideflow.com41

growthmentor.com34

peoplemanagingpeople.com33

softwareadvice.com33

446 of the 446 domain citations in answers naming Mentorloop came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software53

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software49

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms45

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software36

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software34

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software33

qooper.io/blog/top-10-online-mentoring-platforms27

softwareadvice.com/mentoring26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mentorloop

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mentorloop; a claim can dispute any of them.

MentorLoop 2Mentorloop Pro 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mentorloop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mentorloop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mentorloop.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.