HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › PushFar · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Ranked

PushFar

66Judge labels

21First choices

3Negative labels

12 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

39% in Mentoring software for small business buyers

Rank 5 of 55 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 21 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.

Small business1 of 54

under the label threshold

In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PushFar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	10%	5 of 55	5%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PushFar yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PushFar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels3

Paraphrase14 labels9

Comparative22 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained20 labels9

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need to scale beyond ~10 people: PushFar (~$200/month flat) is the cheapest way to run a proper company-wide program” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“PushFar stands out as the top recommendation for mentoring program software” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“start with Mentornity (if under 10 users) or PushFar (~$200/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“PushFar is more affordable but less feature-rich” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PushFar, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PushFar was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Mentorloop47 of 668Not in the top three

Together46 of 662Not in the top three

MentorcliQ38 of 663Not in the top three

Chronus36 of 662Not in the top three

Qooper34 of 664Not in the top three

Mentornity29 of 668Not in the top three

Mentorgain29 of 662Not in the top three

ADPList17 of 660Not in the top three

Guider14 of 660Not in the top three

Ten Thousand Coffees14 of 660Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PushFar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 66 answers that named PushFar and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qooper.io41

brancher.com.au40

gartner.com35

growthmentor.com33

chronus.com32

guideflow.com32

mentorgain.com32

peoplemanagingpeople.com31

getapp.com29

g2.com28

333 of the 333 domain citations in answers naming PushFar came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software40

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software35

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software33

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software31

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms29

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software29

qooper.io/blog/top-10-online-mentoring-platforms25

softwareadvice.com/mentoring22

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PushFar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PushFar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pushfar.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.