Every category where a model named Mentornity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	12%	4 of 55	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mentornity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mentornity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels11

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have 10 or fewer participants: Mentornity (or MentorStack) is essentially free with full features — start here.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“the best mentoring program software for a company with a limited budget is Mentornity” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“start with Mentornity (if under 10 users) or PushFar (~$200/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with Mentornity (free up to 10 users) to test the concept” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mentornity, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mentornity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PushFar29 of 359Not in the top three

Mentorloop27 of 354Not in the top three

Together22 of 353Not in the top three

Mentorgain21 of 350Not in the top three

MentorcliQ19 of 352Not in the top three

Chronus15 of 350Not in the top three

Qooper14 of 354Not in the top three

MicroMentor7 of 350Not in the top three

ADPList6 of 350Not in the top three

MentorStack3 of 351Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mentornity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named Mentornity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brancher.com.au28

guideflow.com21

mentorgain.com21

gartner.com19

qooper.io19

softwareadvice.com18

g2.com17

growthmentor.com16

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

chronus.com14

188 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming Mentornity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software28

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software19

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software19

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software16

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software15

softwareadvice.com/mentoring15

mentorgain.com/blog/best-mentoring-software-india13

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mentornity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mentornity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mentornity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.