Every category where a model named MicroMentor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	2%	11 of 55	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MicroMentor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MicroMentor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“start with a free plan from a reputable platform like ADPList, MicroMentor, or SCORE” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“Free or community-based platforms (like ADPList, MicroMentor, SCORE, and UStrive) are often safer choices for individuals” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · negative prompt · alternative

“For very simple needs, MicroMentor is completely free but has fewer enterprise features” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative

“utilize MicroMentor if you are a small business owner” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“More suited for external mentoring than internal company programs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MicroMentor, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MicroMentor was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SCORE14 of 242Not in the top three

PushFar13 of 247Not in the top three

ADPList12 of 240Not in the top three

MentorcliQ11 of 240Not in the top three

Mentorloop9 of 242Not in the top three

Together9 of 240Not in the top three

GrowthMentor8 of 241Not in the top three

Mentorgain8 of 241Not in the top three

Chronus8 of 240Not in the top three

Mentornity7 of 245Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MicroMentor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named MicroMentor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

growthmentor.com19

adplist.org16

g2.com15

gartner.com14

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

brancher.com.au11

softwareadvice.com11

getapp.com10

qooper.io10

mentorcruise.com9

128 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming MicroMentor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software18

adplist.org/guides/best-mentorship-platforms16

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software14

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software13

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software11

softwareadvice.com/mentoring8

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms7

g2.com/categories/mentoring/free7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MicroMentor

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MicroMentor; a claim can dispute any of them.

MicroMentor/SCORE 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MicroMentor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MicroMentor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at micromentor.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.