Every category where a model named SCORE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	2%	10 of 55	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SCORE yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SCORE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative14 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“start with a free plan from a reputable platform like ADPList, MicroMentor, or SCORE” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice

“Free or community-based platforms (like ADPList, MicroMentor, SCORE, and UStrive) are often safer choices for individuals” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Early-stage small business owners and local entrepreneurs in the U.S.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · alternative

“Established nonprofit programs: SCORE (for entrepreneurs)” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SCORE, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SCORE was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MicroMentor14 of 240Not in the top three

ADPList12 of 240Not in the top three

GrowthMentor10 of 240Not in the top three

Together8 of 241Not in the top three

MentorcliQ8 of 240Not in the top three

Chronus7 of 240Not in the top three

PushFar6 of 244Not in the top three

MentorCruise6 of 240Not in the top three

Mentorloop6 of 240Not in the top three

Qooper5 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SCORE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 24 answers that named SCORE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adplist.org12

growthmentor.com10

consumer.ftc.gov9

g2.com9

mentorcruise.com9

togetherplatform.com9

qooper.io8

gartner.com7

reddit.com6

softwareadvice.com6

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming SCORE came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

adplist.org/guides/best-mentorship-platforms12

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software9

consumer.ftc.gov/articles/when-business-offer-or-coaching-program-scam8

togetherplatform.com/blog/mentoring-software-red-flags-and-how-to-avoid-them8

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2026/04/how-spot-and-avoid-business-coaching-scams7

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software7

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software5

softwareadvice.com/mentoring5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SCORE

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SCORE; a claim can dispute any of them.

MicroMentor/SCORE 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SCORE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SCORE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at score.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.