Every category where a model named GrowthMentor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	0%	20 of 55	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GrowthMentor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GrowthMentor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels2

Paraphrase3 labels2

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Startup founders, growth marketers, and product managers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · comparative prompt · alternative

“GrowthMentor 4.6+/5” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mentoring software · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“require a 3-to-12-month non-refundable upfront commitment (as seen with some pricing tiers on GrowthMentor), proceed with caution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · negative prompt · soft negative

“GrowthMentor: A paid platform with a flat membership fee and access to multiple mentors, but may require some self-matching.” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GrowthMentor, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GrowthMentor was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MentorCruise15 of 280Not in the top three

ADPList14 of 280Not in the top three

MentorcliQ12 of 281Not in the top three

Together11 of 281Not in the top three

SCORE10 of 284Not in the top three

Chronus10 of 281Not in the top three

Qooper10 of 280Not in the top three

Mentorloop9 of 281Not in the top three

MicroMentor8 of 282Not in the top three

Clarity.fm7 of 280Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GrowthMentor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 28 answers that named GrowthMentor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

growthmentor.comYour site12

adplist.org9

brancher.com.au8

qooper.io8

togetherplatform.com8

chronus.com7

gartner.com7

consumer.ftc.gov6

igotanoffer.com6

mentorcruise.com6

Sixty-five of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming GrowthMentor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

adplist.org/guides/best-mentorship-platforms9

growthmentor.com/blog/online-mentoring-platforms-software9

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software7

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms6

consumer.ftc.gov/articles/when-business-offer-or-coaching-program-scam6

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software6

qooper.io/blog/top-10-online-mentoring-platforms6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GrowthMentor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GrowthMentor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at growthmentor.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.