HR AI Index
Index › Learning and development › Mentoring software › Together vs Mentorgain
Mentoring software · September 2026 Edition

Together vs Mentorgain

Eight of twelve models named Together first on the direct prompt; three named Mentorgain. Together was named by twelve of the twelve models and Mentorgain by eight and Together carries 43 labels and Mentorgain 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Together

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Mentorgain

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share37%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4322A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Together reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Mentorloop was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Together vs Mentorloop · Mentorloop vs Mentorgain

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mentoring software page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TogetherFirst choices, of twelve modelsMentorgain
Direct83
Paraphrase92
Comparative10
Budget-constrained002 against Together
Scale-constrained21
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Together and Mentorgain stood in it.

Both were the first choice

2 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallMentorgain, Together alternatives: Guider, Mentorloop
Kimi K2Mentorgain, Together alternatives: Mentorloop, Qooper

Together first, Mentorgain an alternative

6 of 12 modelsMentorgain was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTogether alternatives: Mentorloop, Qooper
Perplexity SonarTogether alternatives: MentorCloud, Mentorgain
Grok 4.1 FastTogether alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop
DeepSeek V4 FlashTogether alternatives: MentorCloud, MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper, Ten Thousand Coffees
Llama 4 MaverickTogether alternatives: Guider, Mentorgain
MiniMax M2.5Together alternatives: Mentorgain, Mentorloop

Mentorgain first, Together an alternative

1 of 12 modelsTogether was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXMentorgain alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper, Together

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mentorloop alternatives: Chronus, Together
Qwen 3.7 FlashChronus alternatives: Culture Amp, Glint, MentorciSe, Together

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniChronus alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Together leads by two points.
Together5%#4 of 11
Mentorgain2%#7 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Together leads by twenty-five points.
Together37%#1 of 11
Mentorgain12%#3 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Together leads by twenty-four points.
Together27%#3 of 7
Mentorgain2%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Together

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“While industry giants like Together, Chronus, and MentorcliQ are excellent, their pricing often starts at $5,000 to $12,000+ per year, which is out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“more premium/custom-priced and usually overkill for tight budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“If I had to pick one safe bet for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd start with Together Platform or Mentorgain for a demo.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Together is the best all-around choice due to its mid-market-specific design, transparent flat-rate pricing, strong AI matching” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Together stands out as the most balanced choice due to its AI-driven matching, strong integrations, and proven track record” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Mentorgain

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“I'd start with Together Platform or Mentorgain for a demo. They hit the sweet spot of functionality without enterprise complexity.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best employee mentoring platform for a mid-sized B2B company would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best overall value for a mid‑market B2B company (fast go‑live, low cost, strong features): Mentorgain” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Together vs MentorloopMentorloop vs MentorgainThe full mentoring software standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.