HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Internal talent marketpl › 365Talents vs Engagedly
Internal talent marketplace · September 2026 Edition

365Talents vs Engagedly

Five of twelve models named 365Talents first on the direct prompt; zero named Engagedly. 365Talents was named by nine of the twelve models and Engagedly by six and 365Talents carries 19 labels and Engagedly 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

365Talents

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Engagedly

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share17%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1910A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 365Talents reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Fuel50 was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Fuel50 vs 365Talents · Fuel50 vs Engagedly

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal talent marketplace page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
365TalentsFirst choices, of twelve modelsEngagedly
Direct50
Paraphrase34
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 365Talents and Engagedly stood in it.

365Talents first, Engagedly an alternative

5 of 12 modelsEngagedly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 Fast365Talents alternatives: Fuel50, Sprad
Mistral Small365Talents alternatives: Engagedly, Sprad
DeepSeek V4 Flash365Talents alternatives: Fuel50, SkyHive
Kimi K2365Talents, Gloat alternatives: Fuel50
MiniMax M2.5365Talents alternatives: Cornerstone OnDemand, Fuel50, TalentGuard, Workday

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniFuel50 alternatives: 365Talents, Gloat, Workday
Gemini 3.5 FlashNestor alternatives: 365Talents, Docebo, Engagedly, Fuel50
Perplexity SonarFuel50 alternatives: 365Talents, Engagedly

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Fuel50 alternatives: Phenom
Llama 4 MaverickSprad alternatives: Gloat, Phenom
Qwen 3.7 FlashTalentGuard alternatives: Eightfold AI, Fuel50
GLM 4.7 FlashXFuel50, Gloat alternatives: Beamery, Sprad, TalentGuard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
365Talents2%#– of 8
Engagedly2%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
365Talents leads by nine points.
365Talents17%#2 of 12
Engagedly9%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
365Talents leads by two points.
365Talents2%#– of 9
Engagedly0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 365Talents

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“I'd suggest starting your evaluation with 365Talents or Gloat. 365Talents offers the best price-to-value ratio and fastest implementation for mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Specifically noted as ideal for mid-size companies needing skills-driven internal mobility without custom development” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Engagedly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“I'd recommend Engagedly or TalentGuard as top internal mobility platforms, with Engagedly edging out as the primary pick” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Fuel50 vs 365TalentsFuel50 vs EngagedlyThe full internal talent marketpl standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.