Every category where a model named 365Talents for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	17%	2 of 129	0%	19	accepted challenger
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	6%	6 of 162	0%	11	accepted challenger
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	18 of 77	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 365Talents yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 365Talents across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	3	0	5
Mistral Small	1	0	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	4	1	2	0	7
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	3	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	2	3	1	0	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	2	3	0	7

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct30 labels6

Paraphrase20 labels6

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting your evaluation with 365Talents or Gloat. 365Talents offers the best price-to-value ratio and fastest implementation for mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice

“Specifically noted as ideal for mid-size companies needing skills-driven internal mobility without custom development” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice

“365Talents as your primary skills intelligence platform (best fit for mid-market companies specifically)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“specialized mid-market platforms like TechWolf, 365Talents, or SkillPanel may be a better fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“HireEZ and 365Talents require contacting sales” GPT-5.4 mini · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 365Talents, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 365Talents was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI63 of 9515Not in the top three

Gloat62 of 9510Not in the top three

Fuel5043 of 956Compare →

Phenom32 of 951Not in the top three

Beamery22 of 950Not in the top three

TalentGuard21 of 957Not in the top three

SeekOut15 of 950Not in the top three

Gem14 of 952Not in the top three

Loxo14 of 952Not in the top three

Workday Skills Cloud14 of 951Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 365Talents. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 89 of the 95 answers that named 365Talents and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fuel50.com43

gartner.com42

guideflow.com31

g2.com29

hrtechsaas.com27

sprad.io27

engagedly.com26

docebo.com23

peoplemanagingpeople.com23

pin.com20

291 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming 365Talents came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces35

sprad.io/blog/internal-talent-marketplace-software-in-2025-vendors-features-pricing-and-rf20

fuel50.com/blog/internal-talent-marketplace-platforms18

guideflow.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software18

hrtechsaas.com/blog/skills-intelligence-software18

engagedly.com/blog/best-talent-mobility-softwares17

learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software17

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as 365Talents

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 365Talents; a claim can dispute any of them.

365Talents (by Docebo) 1Docebo + 365Talents 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 365Talents's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 365Talents, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 365talents.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.