| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 17% | 2 of 99 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 9% | 3 of 129 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 20 of 60 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41% |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 21 of 77 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40% |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 18 of 77 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40% |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 26 of 77 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17% |
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 31 of 55 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22% |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 39 of 162 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19% |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 35 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Engagedly or TalentGuard as top internal mobility platforms, with Engagedly edging out as the primary pick” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid‑market B2B companies, Engagedly, Lattice, Dayforce, or SuccessionStack strike the best balance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“Engagedly and Lattice are the strongest starting points due to their integrated platforms and AI-driven features” Mistral Small · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“Engagedly and Lattice are recommended for mid-market organizations for succession embedded in performance workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 63 answers that named Engagedly and are not a share of its labels.
147 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming Engagedly came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Engagedly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Engagedly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at engagedly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.