HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Engagedly · September 2026 Edition
9 categories · Ranked

Engagedly

63Judge labels
14First choices
4Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
9Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Succession planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 99 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
8 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Engagedly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Succession planningPerformance and talent management17%2 of 990%14accepted challenger
Internal talent marketplacePerformance and talent management9%3 of 1290%10accepted challenger
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%20 of 600%5under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management0%21 of 770%3under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%18 of 770%3under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
Talent intelligencePerformance and talent management0%26 of 770%3under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%
Recognition and rewardsOnboarding and employee experience0%31 of 550%2under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22%
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%39 of 1620%2under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Goals and OKRsPerformance and talent management0%35 of 540%1under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Engagedly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Engagedly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511103
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar13105
Grok 4.1 Fast20103
Mistral Small11204
DeepSeek V4 Flash10203
Llama 4 Maverick12104
Qwen 3.7 Flash21003
Kimi K213206
GLM 4.7 FlashX22206
MiniMax M2.512003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels9
Paraphrase16 labels4
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Engagedly or TalentGuard as top internal mobility platforms, with Engagedly edging out as the primary pick” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid‑market B2B companies, Engagedly, Lattice, Dayforce, or SuccessionStack strike the best balance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“Engagedly and Lattice are the strongest starting points due to their integrated platforms and AI-driven features” Mistral Small · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“Engagedly and Lattice are recommended for mid-market organizations for succession embedded in performance workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Engagedly, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Engagedly was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TalentGuard18 of 633Not in the top three
Leapsome15 of 630Not in the top three
Eightfold AI14 of 632Not in the top three
Culture Amp13 of 632Not in the top three
Gloat13 of 632Not in the top three
Workday13 of 631Not in the top three
Betterworks12 of 634Not in the top three
15Five11 of 630Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Engagedly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 63 answers that named Engagedly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

engagedly.comYour site47
talentguard.com21
gartner.com19
guideflow.com18
firsthr.app17
worldmetrics.org17
peoplemanagingpeople.com15
betterworks.com14
workhuman.com14
feedbackpulse.com12

147 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming Engagedly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Engagedly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Engagedly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at engagedly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack