365Talents vs Phenom
Five of twelve models named 365Talents first on the direct prompt; zero named Phenom. 365Talents was named by nine of the twelve models and Phenom by nine and 365Talents carries 19 labels and Phenom 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal talent marketplace page.
By framing
365TalentsFirst choices, of twelve modelsPhenom
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
365Talents Phenom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 365Talents on the left and Phenom on the right.The direct prompt
365Talents first, Phenom not the choice
5 of 12 modelsPhenom was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
365Talents17%#2 of 12Phenom2%#6 of 12What the models said about 365Talents
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“I'd suggest starting your evaluation with 365Talents or Gloat. 365Talents offers the best price-to-value ratio and fastest implementation for mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Specifically noted as ideal for mid-size companies needing skills-driven internal mobility without custom development” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Phenom
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Fuel50 or Phenom - ... These are more approachable than the enterprise-grade options for mid-sized teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.