AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Skills intelligence › 365Talents vs Gloat
Skills intelligence · October 2026 Edition

365Talents vs Gloat

Two of fourteen models named 365Talents first on the direct prompt; zero named Gloat. 365Talents was named by seven of the fourteen models and Gloat by ten and 365Talents carries 11 labels and Gloat 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

365Talents

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Gloat

criticized challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%48%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1123A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 365Talents reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Skills Base vs 365Talents · Skills Base vs Gloat · TalentGuard vs 365Talents

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the skills intelligence page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
365TalentsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGloat
Direct203 against Gloat
Paraphrase112 against Gloat
Comparative131 against Gloat
Budget-constrained001 against Gloat
Scale-constrained112 against Gloat
Negative002 against Gloat
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, 365Talents and Gloat were named in the same answer sixty-two times, of the 95 answers naming 365Talents and the 337 naming Gloat. In those answers Gloat took the first choice ten times and 365Talents five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 365Talents and Gloat stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
365Talents Gloat first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 365Talents on the left and Gloat on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 365Talents and Gloat stood in it.

365Talents first, Gloat not the choice

2 of 14 modelsGloat was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 mini365Talents alternatives: Eightfold AI, SkillPanel
Perplexity Sonar365Talents alternatives: Docebo, Workday Skills Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastTalentGuard, iMocha alternatives: 365Talents, Engagedly, Fuel50, Gloat
Qwen 3.7 FlashTalentGuard, TechWolf alternatives: AG5, Eightfold AI, Gloat, iMocha
Kimi K2TalentGuard alternatives: 365Talents, Fuel50, TechWolf, iMocha
GLM 4.7 FlashXiMocha alternatives: 365Talents, Fuel50

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5INOP alternatives: Fuel50, Skillsoft Percipio
Gemini 3.5 FlashiMocha alternatives: Fuel50, Retrain.ai, TalentGuard
Mistral SmallFuel50, Neobrain alternatives: TalentGuard, TechWolf
DeepSeek V4 FlashTalentGuard alternatives: Lightcast Open Skills, iMocha
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5Fuel50, iMocha Skills Intelligence Cloud alternatives: Bryq, Engagedly, TalentGuard WorkforceGPT
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Skills Cloud alternatives: TechWolf
Muse Glimmer 30BTalentGuard alternatives: Eightfold AI, SAP SuccessFactors Skills, Skills Base, Workday Skills Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Gloat leads by two points.
Gloat2%#7 of 11
365Talents0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: 365Talents leads at mid-market.
365Talents7%#4 of 16
Gloat4%#8 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Gloat leads at enterprise.
Gloat4%#5 of 14
365Talents2%#7 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 365Talents

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Pure-play AI skills intelligence. Dynamically maps skills from your existing HCM data using AI inference + self-reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose 365Talents if you want the best *dedicated* skills intelligence platform for a mid-market B2B company.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Gloat

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.