Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › Organimi vs OneDirectory

Org charts and org design · September 2026 Edition

Organimi vs OneDirectory

One of twelve models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; five named OneDirectory. Both were named by all twelve models and Organimi carries 40 labels and OneDirectory 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Organimi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

OneDirectory

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share17%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.

Labels4019A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs OneDirectory

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

OrganimiFirst choices, of twelve modelsOneDirectory

Direct15

Paraphrase10

Comparative00

Budget-constrained70

Scale-constrained01

Negative002 against Organimi

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and OneDirectory stood in it.

Organimi first, OneDirectory an alternative

1 of 12 modelsOneDirectory was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Claude Haiku 4.5Organimi alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory

OneDirectory first, Organimi an alternative

5 of 12 modelsOrganimi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Perplexity SonarOneDirectory alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard

Mistral SmallOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme

Llama 4 MaverickOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme

Kimi K2OneDirectory alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi

MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi

Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana

Grok 4.1 FastLucidchart, Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi

GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart

Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Organimi leads by thirty-one points.

Organimi#1 of 12

OneDirectory#– of 12

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Organimi leads by six points.

Organimi#2 of 14

OneDirectory#3 of 14

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

The order flips: OneDirectory leads at enterprise.

OneDirectory#2 of 13

Organimi#7 of 13

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Organimi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Known for print/export problems (especially on larger orgs) and poor in-browser zoom/visibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative

“Organimi (4.3/5) has export/print glitches, poor customization (2/10 in tests), Safari issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative

“Organimi is suitable for organizations of all sizes, from mid-market businesses to global enterprises, making it a scalable solution that grows with your team.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

“For a startup (<25 employees): Use Organimi. It is the cleanest dedicated tool and costs nothing until you grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about OneDirectory

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“OneDirectory is particularly well-suited for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures, holding a 4.9/5 rating on G2” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice

“OneDirectory stands out as the best org chart software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with demos from top-rated (OneDirectory for M365 shops; OrgChart for HR planning)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice

Also compared

ChartHop vs Organimi ChartHop vs OneDirectory The full org charts standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.