Every category where a model named OneDirectory for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	12%	3 of 81	0%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OneDirectory yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OneDirectory across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels6

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels6

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“OneDirectory is particularly well-suited for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures, holding a 4.9/5 rating on G2” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice

“OneDirectory stands out as the best org chart software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with demos from top-rated (OneDirectory for M365 shops; OrgChart for HR planning)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice

“OneDirectory is the best org chart software for a mid-market B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OneDirectory, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneDirectory was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lucidchart34 of 461Not in the top three

OrgChart29 of 469Not in the top three

ChartHop29 of 465Compare →

Microsoft Visio23 of 461Not in the top three

Pingboard20 of 462Not in the top three

Organimi18 of 462Compare →

Orgvue16 of 466Not in the top three

Ingentis org.manager16 of 463Not in the top three

Miro16 of 460Not in the top three

SmartDraw14 of 460Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneDirectory. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 46 answers that named OneDirectory and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

onedirectory.comYour site34

gartner.com31

theorgchart.com30

forbes.com24

peoplemanagingpeople.com20

learn.g2.com19

orgchartstudio.com19

g2.com16

teamohana.com14

worldmetrics.org13

186 of the 220 domain citations in answers naming OneDirectory came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

onedirectory.com/blog/best-org-chart-software34

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software31

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software24

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-org-chart-tools20

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software19

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software19

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-org-chart-software14

teamohana.com/blog/org-chart-software14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneDirectory's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneDirectory, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onedirectory.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.