HR AI Index
Index Vendors › OrgChart · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

OrgChart

87Judge labels
13First choices
19Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Org charts for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 81 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 28% of its 29 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OrgChart for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Org charts and org designWorkforce planning and analytics12%4 of 8128%29criticized challenger
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%31 of 890%4under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%58 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OrgChart yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OrgChart across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini20002
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast10113
Mistral Small00213
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200134
GLM 4.7 FlashX13116
MiniMax M2.511215

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels3
Paraphrase6 labels3
Comparative22 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained18 labels7
Negative19 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative87 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with BambooHR or a specialized tool like OrgChart Pro if you need something more focused on organizational structure visualization” MiniMax M2.5 · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best org chart software is usually OrgChart if you want the strongest mix of HRIS integration, automated updates, and scalability” GPT-5.4 mini · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
“For Workforce Planning + People Analytics: Look at ChartHop or OrgChart.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice
“Start by asking for a demo of ChartHop and OrgChart.com.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Starts around $105/month with a 100-employee minimum.” Kimi K2 · Org charts · budget prompt · hard negative
“requires a minimum of 100 employee records and starts at $105/month billed annually, which can be expensive for smaller organizations” Mistral Small · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve, not intuitive, complex features requiring coding knowledge, limited customization” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
“Many users report a steep learning curve and find the interface "cumbersome" or "not intuitive."” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OrgChart, over the 84 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OrgChart was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ChartHop58 of 847Not in the top three
Lucidchart57 of 847Not in the top three
Pingboard45 of 842Not in the top three
Microsoft Visio43 of 842Not in the top three
Organimi38 of 846Not in the top three
OneDirectory29 of 848Not in the top three
Miro26 of 840Not in the top three
SmartDraw23 of 840Not in the top three
Creately20 of 841Not in the top three
Ingentis org.manager19 of 840Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OrgChart. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 84 answers that named OrgChart and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

theorgchart.com55
gartner.com47
orgchartstudio.comYour site41
onedirectory.com33
forbes.com31
g2.com30
learn.g2.com30
peoplemanagingpeople.com28
peerdom.com22
wifitalents.com19

295 of the 336 domain citations in answers naming OrgChart came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OrgChart

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OrgChart; a claim can dispute any of them.
OrgChart.com 10OrgChart Now 3OrgChart (OrgChart Now / The OrgChart) 1OrgChart (OrgChart.com / OrgChart Now) 1OrgChart (OrgChart.com) 1OrgChart (by OrgChart Pro) 1OrgChart (bybitbucket) 1OrgChart (formerly OrgChart Now) 1OrgChart (specific products) 1OrgChart Pro 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OrgChart's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OrgChart, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orgchartstudio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack