| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 12% | 4 of 81 | 28% | 29 | criticized challenger |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 31 of 89 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31% |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 58 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with BambooHR or a specialized tool like OrgChart Pro if you need something more focused on organizational structure visualization” MiniMax M2.5 · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best org chart software is usually OrgChart if you want the strongest mix of HRIS integration, automated updates, and scalability” GPT-5.4 mini · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
“For Workforce Planning + People Analytics: Look at ChartHop or OrgChart.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice
“Start by asking for a demo of ChartHop and OrgChart.com.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Starts around $105/month with a 100-employee minimum.” Kimi K2 · Org charts · budget prompt · hard negative
“requires a minimum of 100 employee records and starts at $105/month billed annually, which can be expensive for smaller organizations” Mistral Small · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve, not intuitive, complex features requiring coding knowledge, limited customization” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
“Many users report a steep learning curve and find the interface "cumbersome" or "not intuitive."” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 84 answers that named OrgChart and are not a share of its labels.
295 of the 336 domain citations in answers naming OrgChart came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OrgChart's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OrgChart, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orgchartstudio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.