Every category where a model named Ingentis org.manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	14 of 81	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ingentis org.manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ingentis org.manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Ingentis is an enterprise-grade option for org charts, org analytics, and org design, best for mid-market and enterprise HR” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative

“best if you need strong native integration with systems like SAP, Workday, or UKG” Perplexity Sonar · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative

“such as OneDirectory, Organimi, OrgChart, Ingentis org.manager, Sift, or Functionly” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · scale prompt · alternative

“Large, complex orgs with HRIS sync | Ingentis org.manager” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ingentis org.manager, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ingentis org.manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop23 of 312Not in the top three

Lucidchart23 of 310Not in the top three

OrgChart19 of 314Not in the top three

Microsoft Visio19 of 311Not in the top three

OneDirectory16 of 314Not in the top three

Pingboard16 of 310Not in the top three

Orgvue14 of 313Not in the top three

Organimi13 of 314Not in the top three

Nakisa12 of 312Not in the top three

Miro11 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ingentis org.manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 31 answers that named Ingentis org.manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

theorgchart.com21

gartner.com20

onedirectory.com16

learn.g2.com13

forbes.com12

orgchartstudio.com12

peerdom.com11

gitnux.org10

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

g2.com9

134 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming Ingentis org.manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software20

onedirectory.com/blog/best-org-chart-software16

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software15

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software13

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software-for-large-companies13

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software12

peerdom.com/blog/best-org-chart-software11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-org-chart-tools10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ingentis org.manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ingentis org.manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ingentis 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ingentis org.manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ingentis org.manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ingentis.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.