Every category where a model named Nakisa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	19 of 81	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nakisa yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nakisa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The ERP Native (SAP/Workday) Specialist: Nakisa or Ingentis... Cons: Expensive, high implementation costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · scale prompt · alternative

“for traceable org structure diagrams that support governance-style scenario reviews” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Strong for HR or transformation teams needing traceable org structure diagrams” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Nakisa - Enterprise-grade solution for larger mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nakisa, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nakisa was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop17 of 255Not in the top three

OrgChart16 of 257Not in the top three

Orgvue15 of 250Not in the top three

Lucidchart14 of 250Not in the top three

Microsoft Visio14 of 250Not in the top three

Pingboard13 of 250Not in the top three

Ingentis org.manager12 of 253Not in the top three

Miro10 of 250Not in the top three

OneDirectory9 of 252Not in the top three

Organimi8 of 251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nakisa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 25 answers that named Nakisa and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com18

theorgchart.com17

gitnux.org16

worldmetrics.org14

onedirectory.com13

orgchartstudio.com11

learn.g2.com9

g2.com8

forbes.com7

nakisa.comYour site7

113 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming Nakisa came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software18

onedirectory.com/blog/best-org-chart-software13

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software-for-large-companies11

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software9

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software8

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software7

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-org-chart-software7

orgchartstudio.com/blog/org-chart-software-comparison7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nakisa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nakisa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nakisa.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.