HR AI Index
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › ChartHop vs OneDirectory
Org charts and org design · September 2026 Edition

ChartHop vs OneDirectory

Four of twelve models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; five named OneDirectory. ChartHop was named by eleven of the twelve models and OneDirectory by twelve and ChartHop carries 38 labels and OneDirectory 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ChartHop

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

OneDirectory

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share27%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3819A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ChartHop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Organimi was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · Organimi vs OneDirectory

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ChartHopFirst choices, of twelve modelsOneDirectory
Direct45
Paraphrase70
Comparative30
Budget-constrained001 against ChartHop
Scale-constrained31
Negative205 against ChartHop
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ChartHop and OneDirectory stood in it.

ChartHop first, OneDirectory not the choice

4 of 12 modelsOneDirectory was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi, Pingboard, Prolifiq Relationship Map, TeamOhana
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Organice, Tropic
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard

OneDirectory first, ChartHop an alternative

5 of 12 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarOneDirectory alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartHub, Orgvue, Pingboard
Mistral SmallOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Llama 4 MaverickOneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Visme
Kimi K2OneDirectory alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
MiniMax M2.5OneDirectory alternatives: Microsoft Visio, Nakisa, Organimi, SmartDraw

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Organimi alternatives: Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OneDirectory
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: OneDirectory, Organimi
Grok 4.1 FastLucidchart, Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, Organimi

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
ChartHop0%#12 of 12
OneDirectory0%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
ChartHop leads by fifteen points.
ChartHop27%#1 of 14
OneDirectory12%#3 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: OneDirectory leads at enterprise.
OneDirectory16%#2 of 13
ChartHop9%#4 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ChartHop

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - ChartHop: ... requires a ~$9,000/year minimum commitment.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“minimum annual cost of around $9,000 and charges per employee, making it less suitable for smaller companies” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Specialized Standalones (Best for 500) Examples: ChartHop, Xenspace, Datasnapshots ... Verdict: Often the sweet spot for companies at your size.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about OneDirectory

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“OneDirectory is particularly well-suited for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures, holding a 4.9/5 rating on G2” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory stands out as the best org chart software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with demos from top-rated (OneDirectory for M365 shops; OrgChart for HR planning)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartHop vs OrganimiOrganimi vs OneDirectoryThe full org charts standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.