People analytics · October 2026 Edition
Crunchr vs Orgnostic
Six of fourteen models named Crunchr first on the direct prompt; one named Orgnostic. Crunchr was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Orgnostic by seven and Crunchr carries 48 labels and Orgnostic 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Orgnostic
accepted challengerNamed in two categories this edition.
First-choice share22%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4810A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Crunchr reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Crunchr vs ChartHop · Crunchr vs HiBob · Crunchr vs BambooHR
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CrunchrFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgnosticDirect61
Paraphrase40
Comparative10
Budget-constrained003 against Crunchr
Scale-constrained31
Negative315 against Crunchr
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Crunchr and Orgnostic stood in it.
| Model | DirectOR | ParaphraseOR | ComparativeOR | Budget-constrainedOR | Scale-constrainedOR | NegativeOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | OR | OR | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | OR | OR | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | OR | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | OR | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | OR | |
CrunchrOR Orgnostic first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Crunchr on the left and Orgnostic on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Crunchr and Orgnostic stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.GLM 4.7 FlashXCrunchr, Orgnostic alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Worklytics
Crunchr first, Orgnostic not the choice
5 of 14 modelsOrgnostic was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallChartHop, Crunchr alternatives: BambooHR, Eletive
DeepSeek V4 FlashCrunchr alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp
Llama 4 MaverickCrunchr alternatives: Ordio, Workhuman iQ
MiniMax M2.5Crunchr alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Workday People Analytics, Workhuman iQ
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop, Crunchr
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: Crunchr, PeopleInsight
Perplexity SonarHiBob alternatives: Crunchr
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5HiBob alternatives: Rippling, Visier
Gemini 3.5 FlashKnoetic alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Visier
Grok 4.1 FastChartHop alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Eletive, Lattice, Visier
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, One Model, Visier
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Lattice
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, Visier
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Crunchr0%#13 of 16Orgnostic0%#– of 16
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Crunchr leads by nineteen points.
Crunchr22%#1 of 11Orgnostic3%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
What the models said about Crunchr
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“criticized challenger in SMB modelling and included in the enterprise-grade caution list” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-focused tools like Visier, Workday, One Model, ChartHop, Crunchr” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Visier/Crunchr (~$50K+/yr) aren't budget-friendly.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“In summary, Crunchr is a strong, practical choice for organizations that want straightforward, self-service HR analytics and workforce insights, especially in the mid-market segment.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Crunchr and ChartHop are frequently cited as top choices due to their scalability, ease of use, and focus on self-serve analytics.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Crunchr: Best for mid-market and enterprise HR teams that want self-serve people analytics without building everything in BI.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Orgnostic
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Crunchr (fast, self‑serve, GDPR‑first) or Orgnostic (turnkey, survey‑focused)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“For mid-market teams, options often shortlisted are Crunchr, ChartHop, or Orgnostic” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“prioritize out-of-the-box, self-service platforms (like *Crunchr* or *Orgnostic*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.