ChartHop vs Orgnostic
Six of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; one named Orgnostic. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Orgnostic by seven and ChartHop carries 43 labels and Orgnostic 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Orgnostic
accepted challengerNamed in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgnosticEvery model, every framing
| Model | DirectOR | ParaphraseOR | ComparativeOR | Budget-constrainedOR | Scale-constrainedOR | NegativeOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | OR | OR |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | OR | OR | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | OR | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | OR | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | OR | |
ChartHopOR Orgnostic first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Orgnostic on the right.The direct prompt
ChartHop first, Orgnostic not the choice
6 of 14 modelsOrgnostic was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Orgnostic first, ChartHop an alternative
1 of 14 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ChartHop8%#2 of 16ChartHop21%#2 of 11ChartHop11%#3 of 10What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“avoid enterprise-focused tools like ... ChartHop ... ChartHop ($2–$8/employee/month) or Lattice may lack the enterprise depth needed for thousands of users.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“skip if very tight budget ... $9,000/year minimum contract – a deal-breaker for small teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
What the models said about Orgnostic
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Crunchr (fast, self‑serve, GDPR‑first) or Orgnostic (turnkey, survey‑focused)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“For mid-market teams, options often shortlisted are Crunchr, ChartHop, or Orgnostic” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“prioritize out-of-the-box, self-service platforms (like *Crunchr* or *Orgnostic*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.