Workday Adaptive Planning vs TeamOhana
One of fourteen models named Workday Adaptive Planning first on the direct prompt; one named TeamOhana. Workday Adaptive Planning was named by twelve of the fourteen models and TeamOhana by eight and Workday Adaptive Planning carries 36 labels and TeamOhana 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.
By framing
Workday Adaptive PlanningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeamOhana
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Workday Adaptive Planning and TeamOhana were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 131 answers naming Workday Adaptive Planning and the 40 naming TeamOhana. In those answers TeamOhana took the first choice five times and Workday Adaptive Planning one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Workday Adaptive Planning TeamOhana first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workday Adaptive Planning on the left and TeamOhana on the right.The direct prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning first, TeamOhana not the choice
1 of 14 modelsTeamOhana was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.TeamOhana first, Workday Adaptive Planning an alternative
1 of 14 modelsWorkday Adaptive Planning was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
TeamOhana2%#8 of 13Workday Adaptive Planning0%#12 of 13Workday Adaptive Planning5%#4 of 15TeamOhana5%#5 of 15Workday Adaptive Planning29%#2 of 10TeamOhana4%#– of 10What the models said about Workday Adaptive Planning
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid jumping straight to enterprise platforms like ... Workday Adaptive Planning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“$140K–$250K/year; only worth it if already on Workday HCM” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“enterprise-level tools like Workday Adaptive Planning or Anaplan are often too expensive, complex, and slow to implement” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“I'd usually recommend Workday Adaptive Planning if you want a strong balance of headcount planning, finance integration, and scenario modeling.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for organizations already on Workday HCM/Finance... Strengths are ease of use, version control and Workday-native integration.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“The search results specifically mention this segment as the sweet spot for Workday Adaptive Planning, Planful, Abacum, and Visier.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about TeamOhana
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd start with TeamOhana. It's purpose-built to connect Finance, HR, and Talent around a shared hiring plan” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: TeamOhana” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“## Top Recommendation: TeamOhana” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.