HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › TeamOhana · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

TeamOhana

14Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TeamOhana was named 8 times in Workforce planning and 1 other category, where ChartHop led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprise24 of 79

under the label threshold

In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TeamOhana for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	11 of 89	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	22 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TeamOhana yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TeamOhana across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	5	0	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labels2

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TeamOhana: Deeply focused on headcount governance, ensuring seamless synchronization between Finance, Recruiting, and HR with strict approval guardrails.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose TeamOhana if your biggest pain point is recruiting governance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If your primary pain point is HR-Finance Budget Alignment: TeamOhana” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“TeamOhana (Best for High-Growth Headcount & Finance Alignment)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TeamOhana, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TeamOhana was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop14 of 144Not in the top three

Anaplan8 of 141Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning7 of 140Not in the top three

Orgvue6 of 141Not in the top three

Rippling6 of 140Not in the top three

Pigment5 of 141Not in the top three

Lucidchart5 of 140Not in the top three

Visier4 of 141Not in the top three

BambooHR4 of 140Not in the top three

Organimi4 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TeamOhana. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 14 answers that named TeamOhana and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com4

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

resources.rework.com3

anywherer.com2

guideflow.com2

hrtechsaas.com2

intervue.io2

ag5.com1

aipromptshub.co1

articsledge.com1

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming TeamOhana came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-planning-software4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-planning-software3

resources.rework.com/tools/workforce-management/best-workforce-planning-software-20263

anywherer.com/best-workforce-planning-software2

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-planning-software2

hrtechsaas.com/blog/workforce-planning-software2

intervue.io/blog/best-workforce-planning-software2

ag5.com/workforce-planning-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TeamOhana's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TeamOhana, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teamohana.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.