1 category · RankedAnaplan
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 38 of 89 | 44% | 34 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Anaplan if: You need sophisticated scenario modeling across multiple functions and want HR to own the workforce planning process independently.” Kimi K2 · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Anaplan if you need advanced, cross-functional workforce planning and scenario modeling.” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Deep scenario modeling tied to finance | Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Pigment” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Anaplan if you need the most robust enterprise scenario modeling” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) systems—such as Anaplan, Board, or IBM Planning Analytics... Why to be cautious: ... these tools can become a massive "spreadsheet on steroids" trap.:” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“you do not need the extreme complexity, high licensing costs, and long implementation times of enterprise legacy tools like Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · direct prompt · soft negative
“you also do not want to buy a massive, over-engineered enterprise system (like Anaplan or Workday Strategic Planning)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · scale prompt · soft negative
“Anaplan and Workday Adaptive Planning are powerful but can have steep learning curves and high costs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 103 of the 127 answers that named Anaplan and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
369 of the 369 domain citations in answers naming Anaplan came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anaplan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anaplan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at anaplan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.