Comprehensive.io vs Salary.com
Zero of twelve models named Comprehensive.io first on the direct prompt; zero named Salary.com. Comprehensive.io was named by eleven of the twelve models and Salary.com by nine and Comprehensive.io carries 12 labels and Salary.com 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compensation benchmarking data page.
By framing
Comprehensive.ioFirst choices, of twelve modelsSalary.com
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Comprehensive.io Salary.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Comprehensive.io on the left and Salary.com on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Salary.com6%#3 of 10Comprehensive.io2%#6 of 10Comprehensive.io12%#3 of 8Salary.com2%#6 of 8Salary.com3%#6 of 10Comprehensive.io0%#– of 10What the models said about Comprehensive.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“three free salary benchmarking tools cover most needs at zero cost: Pave (tech roles, under 200 employees), Comprehensive.io (US tech daily data), and BLS OEWS” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Free daily-refreshed tech salary data from 6,000+ U.S. companies (no participation needed) ... Great for startups/lean teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Pave and Comprehensive.io are currently leading the market for affordable or free options” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Salary.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Best all-around for mid-sized companies: Compdata Max / Salary.com” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.