HR AI Index
Index Compensation and total rewards Compensation benchmarkin › Radford vs Salary.com
Compensation benchmarking data · September 2026 Edition

Radford vs Salary.com

Zero of twelve models named Radford first on the direct prompt; zero named Salary.com. Radford was named by eleven of the twelve models and Salary.com by nine and Radford carries 27 labels and Salary.com 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Radford

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Salary.com

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate37%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels2716A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Radford reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Payscale was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Payscale vs Radford · Payscale vs Salary.com · Pave vs Radford

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compensation benchmarking data page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
RadfordFirst choices, of twelve modelsSalary.com
Direct003 against Radford
Paraphrase213 against Radford · 1 against Salary.com
Comparative00
Budget-constrained004 against Radford
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Radford and Salary.com were named in the same answer thirty-three times, of the 83 answers naming Radford and the 141 naming Salary.com. In those answers Salary.com took the first choice zero times and Radford five.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Radford and Salary.com stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Radford Salary.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Radford on the left and Salary.com on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Radford and Salary.com stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniPayscale alternatives: Radford, Salary.com
Gemini 3.5 FlashPave alternatives: Carta Total Comp, Figures, Payscale, Radford, Ravio, Salary.com
Grok 4.1 FastPayscale alternatives: Pave, Salary.com
Mistral SmallSalaryCube alternatives: Pave, Payfactors, Salary.com
DeepSeek V4 FlashPayscale alternatives: ERI, Pave, Ravio, Salary.com
Qwen 3.7 FlashPayscale alternatives: Pave, Payfactors, Salary.com, SalaryCube
Kimi K2Payscale, SalaryCube alternatives: Mercer, Radford, Salary.com

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Payscale alternatives: Lattice, SalaryCube, beqom
Perplexity SonarPayscale alternatives: Ravio, SalaryCube
Llama 4 MaverickPayscale
GLM 4.7 FlashXPave alternatives: Aon Radford, CaptivateIQ, Ficstar, Mercer, OpenComp, Payscale Ascent, Ravio, Salary.com CompAnalyst
MiniMax M2.5Payscale alternatives: Comprehensive.io

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Salary.com leads by six points.
Salary.com6%#3 of 10
Radford0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Radford leads at mid-market.
Radford4%#5 of 8
Salary.com2%#6 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Radford leads by thirteen points.
Radford16%#2 of 10
Salary.com3%#6 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Radford

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget ... enterprise-grade pricing with far more data than most small/mid-market companies need” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid traditional surveys (Mercer/Radford: $10k+/year) unless scaling.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“it requires active participation (submitting your own data) and can be expensive and labor-intensive to manage compared to automated tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd typically recommend starting with Radford if you're in tech/SaaS, or Mercer for broader B2B sectors” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mercer or Radford-style benchmark data is often the strongest foundation” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tech-First / Specialized Platforms (Radford, Pave, CompAnalyst, Option Impact) — Best for: Scalability, ease of use, and equity/tech-heavy roles.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · alternative

What the models said about Salary.com

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Best all-around for mid-sized companies: Compdata Max / Salary.com” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.