HR AI Index
Index Compensation and total rewards Earned wage access › Payactiv vs Clair
Earned wage access · September 2026 Edition

Payactiv vs Clair

Zero of twelve models named Payactiv first on the direct prompt; zero named Clair. Payactiv was named by twelve of the twelve models and Clair by eight and Payactiv carries 39 labels and Clair 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Payactiv

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Clair

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share7%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3911A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Payactiv reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ZayZoon was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Tapcheck vs Payactiv · Tapcheck vs Clair · ZayZoon vs Payactiv

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the earned wage access page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PayactivFirst choices, of twelve modelsClair
Direct00
Paraphrase101 against Payactiv
Comparative30
Budget-constrained231 against Payactiv
Scale-constrained00
Negative202 against Payactiv
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Payactiv and Clair were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 115 answers naming Payactiv and the 26 naming Clair. In those answers Clair took the first choice three times and Payactiv one.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Payactiv and Clair stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Payactiv Clair first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Payactiv on the left and Clair on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Payactiv and Clair stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Rain alternatives: Payactiv, ZayZoon
Grok 4.1 FastTapcheck alternatives: DailyPay, Payactiv, Rain, ZayZoon
DeepSeek V4 FlashRain alternatives: Payactiv, ZayZoon
Kimi K2Rain alternatives: Payactiv, Tapcheck, ZayZoon
MiniMax M2.5Rain alternatives: Clair, Payactiv, Tapcheck

Neither was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniDailyPay alternatives: Tapcheck, ZayZoon
Gemini 3.5 FlashZayZoon alternatives: Immediate, Rain, Tapcheck
Perplexity SonarTapcheck alternatives: DailyPay, Rain, ZayZoon
Mistral SmallGusto Wallet, ZayZoon
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashZayZoon alternatives: DailyPay, Rain, Tapcheck
GLM 4.7 FlashXTapcheck alternatives: DailyPay, Rain, ZayZoon

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Payactiv3%#4 of 8
Clair3%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Payactiv7%#4 of 12
Clair7%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Payactiv leads by seventeen points.
Payactiv17%#2 of 9
Clair0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Payactiv

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Verdict: Proceed with Caution. ... the 2025 data breach and previous regulatory disputes should be factored into your decision.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“BBB/CFPB logs (2022\u20132024) cite overdrafts, incorrect debits, poor support (e.g., DailyPay, Payactiv in samples)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Payactiv and DailyPay are also employer-free in many cases but may require more integration for smaller firms” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“1. Payactiv - It's a zero-cost benefit that requires no change to cash flow. Payactiv is the only EWA provider to provide 5 free options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Payactiv as the safer default choice for an employer-sponsored on-demand pay benefit” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most large U.S. employers, DailyPay or PayActiv offer the most robust, scalable solutions” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Clair

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Tapcheck and Clair are frequently highlighted as the most affordable and easiest to implement for small businesses.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“The best earned wage access provider for a company with a limited budget is Clair” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Clair (Best Overall for Native Payroll Integrations)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.