AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Compensation and total rewards › Pay equity › Figures vs Trusaic PayParity
Pay equity · October 2026 Edition

Figures vs Trusaic PayParity

Zero of fourteen models named Figures first on the direct prompt; zero named Trusaic PayParity. Figures was named by nine of the fourteen models and Trusaic PayParity by fourteen and Figures carries 15 labels and Trusaic PayParity 38, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Figures

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Trusaic PayParity

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1538A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Figures reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Payscale was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Syndio vs Figures · Syndio vs Trusaic PayParity · PayAnalytics vs Figures

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the pay equity page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FiguresFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTrusaic PayParity
Direct00
Paraphrase41
Comparative05
Budget-constrained005 against Trusaic PayParity
Scale-constrained011 against Trusaic PayParity
Negative011 against Figures · 5 against Trusaic PayParity
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Figures and Trusaic PayParity were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 75 answers naming Figures and the 112 naming Trusaic PayParity. In those answers Trusaic PayParity took the first choice four times and Figures three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Figures and Trusaic PayParity stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Figures Trusaic PayParity first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Figures on the left and Trusaic PayParity on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Figures and Trusaic PayParity stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Workleap Compensation alternatives: Compport, OpenComp, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
GPT-5.4 miniSyndio alternatives: PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParity
Gemini 3.5 FlashPayAnalytics alternatives: CandorIQ, Pequity, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
Kimi K2PayAnalytics, Syndio alternatives: Payscale, Trusaic PayParity
GLM 4.7 FlashXSyndio alternatives: Aeqium, Affirmity, Compport, Figures, HiBob, Pave, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Workday Pay Equity, beqom Pay Equity
GPT-6 LunaPayscale alternatives: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
Muse Glimmer 30BPayAnalytics, beqom Pay Equity alternatives: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarAeqium alternatives: HiBob, Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, Workleap Compensation
Grok 4.1 FastWorkleap Compensation alternatives: Aeqium, HiBob, Payscale
Mistral SmallAeqium alternatives: Sysarb, Workleap Compensation
DeepSeek V4 FlashPayAnalytics alternatives: Compport, Payscale, Syndio
Llama 4 MaverickWorkleap Compensation alternatives: Affirmity, Effy
Qwen 3.7 FlashPave alternatives: Payscale, Phodata, Workleap Compensation
MiniMax M2.5HiBob alternatives: Aeqium, Pave, Payscale, Workleap Compensation

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Figures leads by two points.
Figures2%#– of 13
Trusaic PayParity0%#12 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Figures leads by four points.
Figures7%#4 of 14
Trusaic PayParity4%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Trusaic PayParity leads at enterprise.
Trusaic PayParity8%#3 of 8
Figures0%#6 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Figures

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Tools requiring heavy analyst intervention (e.g., certain configurations of Aeqium, Figures)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If EU-based or global: Figures offers the best balance of compliance features and usability for mid-market” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Figures or Syndio as they balance functionality with mid-market accessibility” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Figures HR (if EU/UK focus) or Syndio (if global/US focus)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Trusaic PayParity

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Enterprise-focused with quote-only pricing; ... overkill for most small companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise statistical audit giants (e.g., Syndio, Beqom, Trusaic) are highly robust but typically require custom enterprise contracts and significant implementation effort.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“premium, high-end enterprise pay equity software (like Syndio, Trusaic, or Beqom), which typically ... cost tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“the platforms most commonly cited are Syndio, Trusaic or PayAnalytics, depending on whether priority is legal defensibility, remediation workflow or global coverage” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Trusaic PayParity if you need remediation planning, audit-ready reporting, and multi-country compliance.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“or PayParity if you prioritize detailed pay equity analysis. Both have strong mid-market presence” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.