Pay equity · October 2026 Edition
PayAnalytics vs Workleap Compensation
Four of fourteen models named PayAnalytics first on the direct prompt; three named Workleap Compensation. PayAnalytics was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Workleap Compensation by ten and PayAnalytics carries 24 labels and Workleap Compensation 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share12%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2413A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PayAnalytics reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Payscale was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Syndio vs PayAnalytics · Syndio vs Workleap Compensation · PayAnalytics vs Payscale
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the pay equity page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PayAnalyticsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkleap Compensation
Direct43
Paraphrase01
Comparative10
Budget-constrained001 against PayAnalytics
Scale-constrained30
Negative103 against Workleap Compensation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PayAnalytics and Workleap Compensation stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
PayAnalytics Workleap Compensation first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PayAnalytics on the left and Workleap Compensation on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PayAnalytics and Workleap Compensation stood in it.
PayAnalytics first, Workleap Compensation not the choice
4 of 14 modelsWorkleap Compensation was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashPayAnalytics alternatives: CandorIQ, Pequity, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
DeepSeek V4 FlashPayAnalytics alternatives: Compport, Payscale, Syndio
Kimi K2PayAnalytics, Syndio alternatives: Payscale, Trusaic PayParity
Muse Glimmer 30BPayAnalytics, beqom Pay Equity alternatives: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
Workleap Compensation first, PayAnalytics an alternative
3 of 14 modelsPayAnalytics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Workleap Compensation alternatives: Compport, OpenComp, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
Grok 4.1 FastWorkleap Compensation alternatives: Aeqium, HiBob, Payscale
Llama 4 MaverickWorkleap Compensation alternatives: Affirmity, Effy
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniSyndio alternatives: PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParity
Perplexity SonarAeqium alternatives: HiBob, Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, Workleap Compensation
Mistral SmallAeqium alternatives: Sysarb, Workleap Compensation
Qwen 3.7 FlashPave alternatives: Payscale, Phodata, Workleap Compensation
GLM 4.7 FlashXSyndio alternatives: Aeqium, Affirmity, Compport, Figures, HiBob, Pave, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Workday Pay Equity, beqom Pay Equity
MiniMax M2.5HiBob alternatives: Aeqium, Pave, Payscale, Workleap Compensation
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-6 LunaPayscale alternatives: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PayAnalytics leads by two points.
PayAnalytics4%#6 of 13Workleap Compensation2%#– of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
PayAnalytics leads by five points.
PayAnalytics12%#2 of 14Workleap Compensation7%#5 of 14Enterprise
PayAnalytics leads by seventeen points.
PayAnalytics17%#2 of 8Workleap Compensation0%#– of 8What the models said about PayAnalytics
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“usually more enterprise-oriented and demo-based, so likely less budget-friendly” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best Overall for Mid-Market Analytics: PayAnalytics (by beqom) ... widely considered the gold standard for the mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Opt for robust platforms like Syndio, Trusaic, or PayAnalytics with regression analysis, PAG grouping, and remediation sims” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“PayAnalytics | Mid-market friendly, published pricing | Companies at your size wanting a solid regression-based tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workleap Compensation
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Lesser-known or smaller tools (e.g., Barley, Deel) may lack the depth required for enterprise-level analysis.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools Lacking Enterprise Depth (e.g., smaller/low-cost options like Barley... flag them as "avoid for scale"” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Avoid for your scale: Smaller tools like Barley ($5/user/month) or Deel lack enterprise depth"” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Barley is ideal for mid-market and enterprise HR teams needing simple compensation analytics and pay band management.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Barley - ideal for mid-market and enterprise HR teams needing simple compensation analytics and pay band management.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Syndio vs PayAnalyticsSyndio vs Workleap CompensationPayAnalytics vs PayscalePayAnalytics vs FiguresPayAnalytics vs PavePayAnalytics vs Trusaic PayParityPayAnalytics vs AeqiumPayscale vs Workleap CompensationFigures vs Workleap CompensationWorkleap Compensation vs PaveWorkleap Compensation vs Trusaic PayParityWorkleap Compensation vs AeqiumAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full pay equity standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.