GoodTime vs Cal.com
Two of fourteen models named GoodTime first on the direct prompt; one named Cal.com. GoodTime was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cal.com by ten and GoodTime carries 49 labels and Cal.com 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
GoodTimeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCal.com
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, GoodTime and Cal.com were named in the same answer thirty-nine times, of the 155 answers naming GoodTime and the 83 naming Cal.com. In those answers Cal.com took the first choice thirteen times and GoodTime fifteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
GoodTime Cal.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GoodTime on the left and Cal.com on the right.The direct prompt
GoodTime first, Cal.com not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCal.com was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Cal.com first, GoodTime not the choice
1 of 14 modelsGoodTime was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
GoodTime16%#2 of 12Cal.com8%#6 of 12GoodTime55%#1 of 13Cal.com2%#7 of 13What the models said about GoodTime
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to avoid if on a tight budget: Enterprise-level tools like GoodTime or ModernLoop” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Users report technical issues, including frequent crashes, missing time slots, and incorrect calendar availability display.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caveat: It has a steeper price tag (often starting around $15,000 to $40,000/year) and a longer implementation curve” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“look toward standalone partners like Goodtime or Gem as they are designed specifically for the volume and complexity typical of 500-person companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Platforms like candidate.fyi, GoodTime, and ModernLoop are specifically designed to handle complex, multi-stage panel loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“For complex panels, frequent rescheduling, or lots of recruiting coordination, compare GoodTime and ModernLoop.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cal.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“If you want a modern standalone tool for $0: Go with Cal.com (to create multiple interview types for free)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly’s free plan or Cal.com’s free/low-cost tier, because both cover basic scheduling” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly (free) or Cal.com (free tier) | Instant set‑up, embeddable links, zero cost” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.