Cal.com vs Koalendar
One of fourteen models named Cal.com first on the direct prompt; zero named Koalendar. Cal.com was named by ten of the fourteen models and Koalendar by seven and Cal.com carries 21 labels and Koalendar 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
Cal.comFirst choices, of fourteen modelsKoalendar
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Cal.com Koalendar first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cal.com on the left and Koalendar on the right.The direct prompt
Cal.com first, Koalendar not the choice
1 of 14 modelsKoalendar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Koalendar14%#2 of 15Cal.com3%#6 of 15Cal.com8%#6 of 12Koalendar6%#7 of 12What the models said about Cal.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“If you want a modern standalone tool for $0: Go with Cal.com (to create multiple interview types for free)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly’s free plan or Cal.com’s free/low-cost tier, because both cover basic scheduling” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly (free) or Cal.com (free tier) | Instant set‑up, embeddable links, zero cost” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Koalendar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“It's the top pick for simple automated interview scheduling, especially for small and mid-sized recruiting teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Koalendar or Calendly's free plan to get basic functionality without cost.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Cal.com free tier or Koalendar free forever give the most features without cost” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.