Greenhouse vs Koalendar
Three of twelve models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; zero named Koalendar. Greenhouse was named by twelve of the twelve models and Koalendar by ten and Greenhouse carries 28 labels and Koalendar 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
GreenhouseFirst choices, of twelve modelsKoalendar
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Greenhouse Koalendar first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and Koalendar on the right.The direct prompt
Greenhouse first, Koalendar an alternative
3 of 12 modelsKoalendar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Koalendar11%#2 of 11Greenhouse0%#8 of 11Greenhouse13%#3 of 11Koalendar11%#4 of 11Greenhouse7%#3 of 9Koalendar0%#– of 9What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Expensive, longer setup (4-8 wks), quote-only ... they're overkill (and 2-5x costlier) for most mid-sized B2B ops” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Greenhouse is a strong fit for mid-size to enterprise companies with dedicated recruiting teams managing high volumes of interviews” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Koalendar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The best interview scheduling software for a company with a limited budget is Koalendar, which offers a genuinely free-forever plan and is simple to use.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“the best interview scheduling software is usually Calendly or Koalendar if you want a dedicated scheduler” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend starting with Koalendar or Calendly since they offer the most robust free plans” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.