Greenhouse vs Workable
Three of twelve models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; zero named Workable. Greenhouse was named by twelve of the twelve models and Workable by ten and Greenhouse carries 28 labels and Workable 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
GreenhouseFirst choices, of twelve modelsWorkable
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Greenhouse and Workable were named in the same answer 126 times, of the 370 answers naming Greenhouse and the 288 naming Workable. In those answers Workable took the first choice twenty-four times and Greenhouse thirty.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Greenhouse Workable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and Workable on the right.The direct prompt
Greenhouse first, Workable not the choice
3 of 12 modelsWorkable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Workable2%#– of 11Greenhouse0%#8 of 11Greenhouse13%#3 of 11Workable4%#8 of 11Greenhouse7%#3 of 9Workable—not namedWhat the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Expensive, longer setup (4-8 wks), quote-only ... they're overkill (and 2-5x costlier) for most mid-sized B2B ops” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Greenhouse is a strong fit for mid-size to enterprise companies with dedicated recruiting teams managing high volumes of interviews” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Avoid ATS-style recruiting platforms like Breezy HR, Workable, or GoodTime if budget is tight” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.