Interview scheduling · September 2026 Edition
Greenhouse vs GoodTime
Three of twelve models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; two named GoodTime. Both were named by all twelve models and Greenhouse carries 28 labels and GoodTime 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share13%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%24%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2845A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Greenhouse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ModernLoop was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Calendly vs Greenhouse · Calendly vs GoodTime · ModernLoop vs Greenhouse
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GreenhouseFirst choices, of twelve modelsGoodTime
Direct321 against GoodTime
Paraphrase401 against Greenhouse · 1 against GoodTime
Comparative05
Budget-constrained001 against Greenhouse · 4 against GoodTime
Scale-constrained031 against GoodTime
Negative014 against GoodTime
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Greenhouse and GoodTime stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Greenhouse GoodTime first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and GoodTime on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Greenhouse and GoodTime stood in it.
Greenhouse first, GoodTime an alternative
3 of 12 modelsGoodTime was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Cronofy, Greenhouse alternatives: Calendly, Koalendar, ModernLoop
DeepSeek V4 FlashGreenhouse, ModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, Calendly, Lever
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse alternatives: Calendly, GoodTime, Lever, LimeLight, Lunacal
GoodTime first, Greenhouse an alternative
2 of 12 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniGoodTime alternatives: Ashby, Calendly
Grok 4.1 FastGoodTime, Lever alternatives: Greenhouse, ModernLoop
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Lever
Llama 4 MaverickModernLoop alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Kimi K2Lever alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop
GLM 4.7 FlashXModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Lever, candidate.fyi
MiniMax M2.5Cal.com, Lever alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop
Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, candidate.fyi
Mistral SmallLever alternatives: Koalendar, ModernLoop
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Greenhouse0%#8 of 11GoodTime0%#10 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Greenhouse leads by four points.
Greenhouse13%#3 of 11GoodTime9%#5 of 11Enterprise
The order flips: GoodTime leads at enterprise.
GoodTime56%#1 of 9Greenhouse7%#3 of 9What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Expensive, longer setup (4-8 wks), quote-only ... they're overkill (and 2-5x costlier) for most mid-sized B2B ops” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Greenhouse is a strong fit for mid-size to enterprise companies with dedicated recruiting teams managing high volumes of interviews” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about GoodTime
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid ATS-style recruiting platforms like Breezy HR, Workable, or GoodTime if budget is tight” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise, quote-only, often thousands per month — avoid these on a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Frequent reports of bugs like missing time slots, crashes, slow performance, calendar sync glitches, and timezone issues.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose GoodTime if you have a dedicated recruiting team and want to automate the administrative side of interviewing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“GoodTime is the top choice for enterprises whose scheduling challenge extends beyond simple booking” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall for mid-market recruiting teams: GoodTime if you run multi-interviewer panels” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Calendly vs GreenhouseCalendly vs GoodTimeModernLoop vs GreenhouseModernLoop vs GoodTimeGreenhouse vs KoalendarGreenhouse vs LeverGreenhouse vs candidate.fyiGreenhouse vs WorkableKoalendar vs GoodTimeGoodTime vs LeverGoodTime vs candidate.fyiGoodTime vs WorkableAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full interview scheduling standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.