One of twelve models named Appcast first on the direct prompt; zero named ZipRecruiter. Appcast was named by eleven of the twelve models and ZipRecruiter by twelve and Appcast carries 27 labels and ZipRecruiter 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the job advertising and distribution page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Appcast and ZipRecruiter were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 117 answers naming Appcast and the 86 naming ZipRecruiter. In those answers ZipRecruiter took the first choice three times and Appcast eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise-heavy ones like Joveo/Appcast—they excel at cost savings *at scale* ... but minimums are too high for limited budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Best for large enterprise spend optimization: Appcast, Joveo, or Recruitics, but these are generally more enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“carefully review their minimum spend limits to see if they fit a 500-person budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Appcast appears to be the most budget-friendly option with its low minimum spend ($200-300), pay-per-applicant model, and no software fees” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Appcast – largest publisher breadth, pay-per-application model, strong ATS integrations (best for mid-size→enterprise breadth)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“### 1. Appcast ... Best for: Small businesses wanting performance-based pricing with low upfront costs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Many major platforms (including Indeed and ZipRecruiter) have shifted heavily toward pay-per-click or pay-per-application models” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“some users report that its job matching algorithm is ineffective and that it may repost outdated or fake listings” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ineffective matching, ghost jobs, scammers hijack listings; mixed ROI complaints despite some successes.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest ZipRecruiter because: ✅ Broad distribution (100+ boards)” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses, ZipRecruiter is the best option” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“A Connector Tool (Like ZipRecruiter or Jobvite) to distribute the above posts to lesser-known boards automatically.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.