HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Recruiting CRM › Gem vs hireEZ
Recruiting CRM and sourcing · September 2026 Edition

Gem vs hireEZ

Six of twelve models named Gem first on the direct prompt; two named hireEZ. Both were named by all twelve models and Gem carries 39 labels and hireEZ 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Gem

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

hireEZ

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share18%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3930A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Gem reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SeekOut was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Lever vs Gem · Lever vs hireEZ · Gem vs Manatal

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Recruiting CRM and sourcing page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GemFirst choices, of twelve modelshireEZ
Direct62
Paraphrase20
Comparative20
Budget-constrained001 against hireEZ
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against Gem · 1 against hireEZ
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Gem and hireEZ were named in the same answer 114 times, of the 197 answers naming Gem and the 161 naming hireEZ. In those answers hireEZ took the first choice five times and Gem twenty-two.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Gem and hireEZ stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Gem hireEZ first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Gem on the left and hireEZ on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Gem and hireEZ stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Claude Haiku 4.5Gem, hireEZ alternatives: Jobvite, Loxo, SeekOut

Gem first, hireEZ an alternative

5 of 12 modelshireEZ was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Fetcher, SeekOut, ZoomInfo Talent, hireEZ
Perplexity SonarGem alternatives: Fetcher, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZ
Mistral SmallGem, Lever alternatives: Juicebox, SeekOut, hireEZ
DeepSeek V4 FlashGem alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, hireEZ
GLM 4.7 FlashXGem alternatives: Juicebox, Manatal, SeekOut, hireEZ

hireEZ first, Gem an alternative

1 of 12 modelsGem was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2hireEZ alternatives: Gem, LinkedIn Recruiter

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: Gem, Gorilla Search, SeekOut
MiniMax M2.5Lever, SeekOut alternatives: Findem, Gem, hireEZ

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: SeekOut, Workable, Zoho Recruit
Grok 4.1 FastLever alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, Workable
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Gem leads by two points.
Gem2%#7 of 13
hireEZ0%#13 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Gem leads by fourteen points.
Gem18%#2 of 11
hireEZ5%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Gem leads by five points.
Gem10%#4 of 6
hireEZ5%#6 of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Gem

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Gem — widely praised for workflow, but users repeatedly report inaccurate/outdated email addresses and scraping issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Best Standalone CRM: Gem ... Gem is the market standard for high-growth B2B companies with outbound-heavy sourcing models.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Outbound, high\u2011volume, want CRM + analytics | Gem | Best\u2011in\u2011class CRM + AI sourcing; strong reporting for ROI.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about hireEZ

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“stronger for sourcing quality, but it's generally more of a premium option and pricing is often quote-based” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“For pipeline building and automated outreach, Gem and HireEZ are highly effective” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.