HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Recruiting CRM › Pin vs hireEZ
Recruiting CRM and sourcing · September 2026 Edition

Pin vs hireEZ

Zero of twelve models named Pin first on the direct prompt; two named hireEZ. Pin was named by six of the twelve models and hireEZ by twelve and Pin carries 11 labels and hireEZ 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Pin

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

hireEZ

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share7%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1130A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pin reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SeekOut was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Lever vs Pin · Lever vs hireEZ · Gem vs Pin

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Recruiting CRM and sourcing page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PinFirst choices, of twelve modelshireEZ
Direct02
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained301 against hireEZ
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against hireEZ
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Pin and hireEZ were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 163 answers naming Pin and the 161 naming hireEZ. In those answers hireEZ took the first choice three times and Pin sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pin and hireEZ stood in it.
ModelDirectPIParaphrasePIComparativePIBudget-constrainedPIScale-constrainedPINegativePI
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashPI
Perplexity SonarPI
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 FlashPI
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5PI
PI Pin hireEZPI first choicePI named as an alternativePI argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pin on the left and hireEZ on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pin and hireEZ stood in it.

hireEZ first, Pin not the choice

2 of 12 modelsPin was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Gem, hireEZ alternatives: Jobvite, Loxo, SeekOut
Kimi K2hireEZ alternatives: Gem, LinkedIn Recruiter

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Fetcher, SeekOut, ZoomInfo Talent, hireEZ
Perplexity SonarGem alternatives: Fetcher, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZ
Mistral SmallGem, Lever alternatives: Juicebox, SeekOut, hireEZ
DeepSeek V4 FlashGem alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, hireEZ
GLM 4.7 FlashXGem alternatives: Juicebox, Manatal, SeekOut, hireEZ
MiniMax M2.5Lever, SeekOut alternatives: Findem, Gem, hireEZ

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: SeekOut, Workable, Zoho Recruit
Grok 4.1 FastLever alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, Workable
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: Gem, Gorilla Search, SeekOut

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Pin leads by twenty-three points.
Pin23%#1 of 13
hireEZ0%#13 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Pin leads by two points.
Pin7%#5 of 11
hireEZ5%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: hireEZ leads at enterprise.
hireEZ5%#6 of 6
Pin0%#– of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Pin

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about hireEZ

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“stronger for sourcing quality, but it's generally more of a premium option and pricing is often quote-based” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“For pipeline building and automated outreach, Gem and HireEZ are highly effective” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.