HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Recruitment marketing › Teamtailor vs Jobvite
Recruitment marketing and career sites · September 2026 Edition

Teamtailor vs Jobvite

One of twelve models named Teamtailor first on the direct prompt; six named Jobvite. Teamtailor was named by ten of the twelve models and Jobvite by nine and Teamtailor carries 24 labels and Jobvite 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Teamtailor

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Jobvite

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share16%14%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2416A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamtailor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Teamtailor vs Workable · Workable vs Jobvite

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamtailorFirst choices, of twelve modelsJobvite
Direct16
Paraphrase50
Comparative10
Budget-constrained101 against Teamtailor
Scale-constrained11
Negative202 against Teamtailor · 1 against Jobvite
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamtailor and Jobvite stood in it.

Teamtailor first, Jobvite an alternative

1 of 12 modelsJobvite was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Recruitee, TalentLyft

Jobvite first, Teamtailor an alternative

6 of 12 modelsTeamtailor was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallJobvite alternatives: Joveo, Phenom, iCIMS
DeepSeek V4 FlashJobvite alternatives: Beamery, Phenom, Teamtailor, Workable
Llama 4 MaverickJobvite
Qwen 3.7 FlashJobvite alternatives: SmartDreamers, iCIMS
Kimi K2Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Beamery, Phenom
MiniMax M2.5Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Gem, Phenom, Teamtailor

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Lever, Teamtailor
Perplexity SonarPhenom alternatives: SmartDreamers, Teamtailor

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5SmartDreamers alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobilla, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo
GPT-5.4 miniPhenom alternatives: Beamery, Joveo, Radancy
GLM 4.7 FlashXTalentLyft, Workable alternatives: Recruitee

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamtailor leads by eleven points.
Teamtailor11%#3 of 16
Jobvite0%#– of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Teamtailor leads by two points.
Teamtailor16%#1 of 15
Jobvite14%#3 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Jobvite leads at enterprise.
Jobvite2%#– of 13
Teamtailor0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teamtailor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid for tight budgets: ... Teamtailor (~$200+/month custom)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“G2's recent review summaries for Teamtailor, for example, mention support and functionality complaints alongside positives.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Moderate (not "avoid," but verify)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Teamtailor if your priority is a modern, branded career site that also handles recruiting well” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Safer Bets: Stick to G2/Capterra leaders like Teamtailor (4.6/5), Bullhorn, or Joveo for proven track records” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“or Teamtailor if you want an all-in-one ATS + career site solution that's easy to implement and manage” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jobvite

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Users highlight outdated UI, clunky reporting, high pricing, and migration pains” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Jobvite offers the most complete recruitment marketing suite tuned to your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend prioritizing Teamtailor, Jobvite, or similar mid-market focused suites.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Jobvite is widely considered the best all-around recruitment marketing platform.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.