Every category where a model named Jobvite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	14%	3 of 81	6%	16	accepted challenger
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	2%	13 of 88	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	45 of 50	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	30 of 109	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	46 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jobvite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jobvite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	2	3
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	0	0	3
Kimi K2	1	1	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	3	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels7

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Jobvite offers the most complete recruitment marketing suite tuned to your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · first choice

“I recommend prioritizing Teamtailor, Jobvite, or similar mid-market focused suites.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice

“My Top Recommendation: Jobvite (or Zoho Recruit if you want a lower entry price)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Jobvite is widely considered the best all-around recruitment marketing platform.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why avoid it: Recurring complaints about support, performance, and usability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative

“a capable enterprise system with a real AI interview tool, but it has a lower G2 score compared to other enterprise systems” Llama 4 Maverick · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · soft negative

“Users highlight outdated UI, clunky reporting, high pricing, and migration pains” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

“Jobvite (hated for enterprise/high-volume use)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jobvite, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jobvite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lever16 of 403Not in the top three

Greenhouse16 of 402Not in the top three

Workable16 of 401Compare →

Phenom14 of 401Not in the top three

iCIMS14 of 400Not in the top three

Beamery13 of 400Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters13 of 400Not in the top three

Workday Recruiting12 of 401Not in the top three

Gem10 of 401Not in the top three

Ashby9 of 401Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jobvite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 40 answers that named Jobvite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com24

g2.com16

learn.g2.com15

jugglehire.com13

joveo.com11

capterra.com9

recruitcompare.io8

reddit.com8

lever.co7

metaview.ai7

118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Jobvite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

jugglehire.com/blog/recruitment-software/recruitment-marketing-software12

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms12

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing9

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software9

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms8

recruitcompare.io/best/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms8

reddit.com/r/Recruitment/comments/19bnsna/whats_the_best_and_worst_applicant_tracking7

herohunt.ai/blog/best-recruitment-marketing-tools6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Jobvite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jobvite; a claim can dispute any of them.

Jobvite (Employ Inc.) 1Jobvite (by Employ Inc.) 1Jobvite (now part of Employ Inc.) 1Jobvite (now part of Workday) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jobvite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jobvite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jobvite.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.